Educational Researcher, December 2008

The December issue of Educational Researcher has been published, and it is a special issue on Foundations for Success: The Final Report of the National Mathematics Advisory Panel. The issue contains 13 interesting articles with a focus on the Math Panel Report:

• Anthony E. Kelly: Reflections on the National Mathematics Advisory Panel Final Report
  
• Hilda Borko and Jennifer A. Whitcomb: Teachers, Teaching, and Teacher Education: Comments on the National Mathematics Advisory Panel’s Report
  
• Paul Cobb and Kara Jackson: The Consequences of Experimentalism in Formulating Recommendations for Policy and Practice in Mathematics Education
  
• Patrick W. Thompson: On Professional Judgment and the National Mathematics Advisory Panel Report: Curricular Content
  
• Jo Boaler: When Politics Took the Place of Inquiry: A Response to the National Mathematics Advisory Panel’s Review of Instructional Practices 
  
• Joanne Lobato: On Learning Processes and the National Mathematics Advisory Panel Report 
  
• Lorrie A. Shepard: Commentary on the National Mathematics Advisory Panel Recommendations on Assessment 
  
• Jeremy Roschelle, Corinne Singleton, Nora Sabelli, Roy Pea, and John D. Bransford: Mathematics Worth Knowing, Resources Worth Growing, Research Worth Noting: A Response to the National Mathematics Advisory Panel Report 
  
• James G. Greeno and Allan Collins: Commentary on the Final Report of the National Mathematics Advisory Panel 
  
• Finbarr C. Sloane: Randomized Trials in Mathematics Education: Recalibrating the Proposed High Watermark 
  
• Jere Confrey, Alan P. Maloney, and Kenny H. Nguyen: Breaching the Conditions for Success for a National Advisory Panel 
  
• James P. Spillane: Policy, Politics, and the National Mathematics Advisory Panel Report: Topology, Functions, and Limits 
  
• Camilla Persson Benbow and Larry R. Faulkner: Rejoinder to the Critiques of the National Mathematics Advisory Panel Final Report